This document was prepared with teachers of English 110 and 120 in mind, but might be relevant and interesting to students and instructors in other departments.
In writing classes like English 110 and 120, it can be difficult to
identify the content (or teaching points)-they get obscured by the
more general goals of writing effectively in a variety of contexts
and genres, integrating knowledge and ideas, and understanding
literacy. The following list identifies the content typically
covered in English 110 and 120; instructors are not expected to
cover ever single item on the list, nor use every single
assignment, but they should be aware of what their peers are
teaching, and they should try to align their teaching with others
in the program. These items are keyed to Call to Write (CTW), but
most of these principles can be found in other textbooks, and/or
taught in a variety of ways. The "handouts" refer to handouts
developed by Kevin Brooks, available from him upon request.
This listing of "5 this" and "4 that" is meant to highlight the
fact that CTW and other texts actually support some pretty specific
rhetorical concepts and skills that we should be trying to teach to
students (just teaching process is not enough). These items need
to be taught with rhetorical sensibility in mind: the dividing
lines between domains of writing, genres, organizational
strategies, etc., are never hard and fast borders, but instead are
meant to be conceptual guides or rough road maps. Students often
need to be able to see that there are many stylistics or
organizational options available for use before they can begin to
make good choices about style, organization, etc.
5 Factors that Writers Consider: Purpose, Audience, Genre, Style,
Social context. (CTW pp. 2-4)
4 Domains of Writing: Home, School, Public, Work. (CTW Chapter
1)
3 Styles of writing: informal, middle, formal. (Handout)
3 Break points in writing: beginnings, endings, transitions. (CTW
pp. 535-41)
3-6 genres (or more): Appropriate genre chapters + handouts.
Emphasize generic conventions AND flexibility.
3 purposes: to entertain, inform, persuade. (handout; CTW genre
chapters address purpose)
2 audiences-addressed and invoked-3 distances: close, mid-range,
distant. (handouts)
3 patterns of organization: Top down, culminating, open-form. (CTW
pp. 521-34)
3 rhetorical appeals: ethos, logos, pathos. (CTW 70-73)
2 approaches to reading: close reading, rhetorical analysis; 3
stages: comprehend, evaluate, respond. (CTW chapter 2)
3 strategies for working with sources: Paraphrase, summary,
quotation. (CTW 36 for summary; 444-45 for an overview of all
three).
3 Domains of knowledge: library, surface web, deep web (handout,
CTW).
2 principles of documentation: in-text and end-of-text. (CTW
451-67)
2 styles of documentation-MLA and APA-but emphasize the principles
(CTW Chapter 13) and encourage students to find out what system is
used in their major.
While rhetorical analysis is a common and appropriate assignment
for both courses, and avoiding plagiarism is taught in both
courses, the other four points under "analysis and argumentation"
are likely to be emphasized in English 120, rather than English
110.
• Rhetorical analysis has an important role to play in both
courses, including rhetorical analysis of visual communication.
(CTW 49-55; 93-97 for sample rhetorical analyses.)
• Avoiding plagiarism: distinguishing between your views and
others' (CTW 448-50)
• Four things readers expect from arguments: clear position,
supporting evidence, explanation of how the evidence actually
supports the position, a sense of the larger implications of the
position. (CTW 61-62)
• The three rhetorical appeals-ethos, logos, pathos-should be
points of analysis as well as appeals our students can draw on in
their writing. (CTW 70-73)
• The six parts of an argument. Claims, evidence, and other
nuances of argumentation: enabling assumptions, backing,
acknowledging differing views, qualifiers. Focusing on claims and
evidence is a pretty good start! (CTW 75-80)
• Types of evidence: expert opinions (from secondary research),
evidence based on observation, interview, or surveys (field
research), and evidence based on personal experience. (Relevant CTW
chapters). Question to ask about evidence (CTW 77).
Habits
Many students simply have bad academic habits (and quite frankly,
we all probably have some bad teaching habits). Here are some good
habits we try to encourage in English 110 and 120.
1. 10 minutes a day: use in-class writing, journaling, blogging,
or other strategies to get your students writing regularly.
2. Planning, Drafting, Revising: break the "last minute" habit.
(CTW Chapter 16)
3. Seek out information and models: be an active composer.
(handouts, activities)
4. Peer review: sideshadowing, using rubrics, giving and taking
constructive criticism. (Handout, CTW peer review questions,
assignment rubrics, regular practice)
5. Be observant, thoughtful, and curious: if you don't have much
to say, you might end up with a well-crafted but empty essay.
(Explained on syllabus, orally re-enforced throughout the
semester).
Within your class, you will likely encourage your students to
think about issues of race, class, gender, social justice, or maybe
even the meaning of life (although the latter is an English class
cliché you might want to avoid). Within the program, we have
identified two big ideas we would like instructors to
address:
Understanding Literacy (overly in 110; implicitly in 120):
"According to [Mike] Rose, the central problem of university
writers is that they have not developed critical literacy, which he
defined as 'framing an argument or taking someone else's argument
apart, systematically inspecting a document, an issue, or an event,
synthesizing different points of view, applying a theory to
disparate phenomena' (188) (Robert Samuels, Integrating
Hypertextual Subjects 64-65). English 110 and 120 should encourage
students to work critically with the new technologies of literacy,
to be aware of the specific kinds of literate skills expected in
their major, while still challenging them to improve their already
established literacy skills. (Assignments: research writing in
major, join the "new literacy" debate and write a commentary, write
a literacy memoir or a technological literacy memoir, etc..)
The English department has adopted "understanding leadership" as a
content goal for English 120 because part of being an effective
writer and communicator can also mean being an effective leader or
collaborator. While civic leaders are often examples of good
communicators, students should come to see through the
collaborative assignments and explorations of leadership in this
course that leadership can take many forms, and individuals who
communicate well can either take leadership roles or support strong
teams throughout college, into their careers, and within their
communities. (Assignments: leadership profiles, collaborative
assignments ("Taking the Lead" proposal), commentaries on social
issues, etc..)
Based on years of research in composition studies, and based on
3 years of sustained assessment at NDSU, we can say with confidence
that students new to academic writing face the following
challenges. They have:
• difficulty with analysis and evaluation; they tend to
summarize and report.
• difficulty with formal prose and incorporating others' ideas;
they have a preference for personal writing that does not use
sources.
• difficulty developing ideas with concrete, specific language
and examples; they say things like "you want five pages??!!"
• difficulty editing their own prose; they are reluctant to
proofread and revise.
• difficulty reading or interpreting assignments; international
students frequently show a much stronger grasp of assignments than
do North American students.
1. Effective, close reading.
• More emphasis on reading instruction in class, and through
assignments.
• Seek reading material that might engage under-prepared
students.
2. Developing stronger habits-a stronger process emphasis in 110
than 120.
• Significant time invested in drafting and revising.
• Frequent short writing assignments with regular feedback,
building towards more complex assignments.
3. Identifying strengths and areas in need of improvement:
preparing students to succeed in English 120.
• One-on-one conferences used to identify strengths and areas in
need of improvement.
• Introduce key concepts (5 factors especially) so English 120
won't seem like a completely different course.
1. Visual or design principles for writing:
• Genres have design conventions, and visual communication can
be used for emphasis (logos) and appeal (ethos and/or pathos).
• Four "gestalt" design principles: group similar elements
together, align visual elements, use repetition and contrast to
create consistent visual patterns, add visual interest.
2. Research: all assignments should work from sources and involve
research.
• Field research: Observation, survey, interview as ways of
gathering information.
• Surface web, deep web, and library identified as the 3 major
domains for secondary research; students are surprisingly
unsophisticated surface web researchers, unfamiliar with the deep
web, and reluctant to use the library.
3. Group writing, or collaboration:
• Stages of group work: forming, storming, norming, performing.
(CTW and Handout)
• Various strategies for meetings, sharing work, staying on task
(CTW Chapter 18).
• Types of conflict: procedural, affective, substantive.
(Handout)
• Project management (handout).
• Role playing within groups: group manager, group
recorder/communicator, idea generator, devil's advocate, and roles
specific to the tasks (CTW and Handout).
You might see a need to employ some of these familiar concepts
during a 1-on-1 conference or in response to difficulties your
particular class is having. Let the First-Year English committee
know if you are having success teaching concepts or strategies
nowhere to be found on these four pages.
• 2 types of prose: Reader-based prose, writer-based prose.
• Subject-Verb-Completer (SVC) and other sentence
patterns.
• Compare-contrast as an important organizational or rhetorical
strategy.
• Argumentative fallacies (lists of fallacies are easy to find
on the web).
• Daily editing exercises: an icebreaker that gets students to
think about editing. It can be an effective inductive way of
teaching a variety of sentence-level concerns.
• Focus, organization, development, expression. A useful set of
key terms, much like the five factors that writers consider. This
heuristic doesn't overtly remind students to think about audience,
context, purpose-those are implied. This set of terms is
text-based, rather than context based.